Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit. Now the status is awaiting DE decision.

Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit WE could always say we'll only have X amount of active articles at a time but Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I once waited five months before the editor rejected without sending it to reviewers Reply reply No_Income6576 • Omg. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? My lab has had papers desk rejected at low IF journals and then accepted at high IF places, it just kinda depends on the editor’s workload and what they thought about the paper. I can't see any scenario in which the average time to acceptance is 1. This work means the world to my team. Once it gets sent out for review, you have no control over the I’ve been an academic editor at a good journal for a few years now (not a professional - I’m an academic who serves for free). co. Other journals cannot offer pre-review of a submission, and this includes feedback on your research agenda’s fit with the journal. I didn't actually the Reviewer 2 If it's consistently desk rejected then you need to change it. As for the reviews, I have to admit that the first 2 sets of reviews (ignoring the desk rejection) were useful and the paper is probably better thanks to them. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Share Sort by: Best. this implies that your paper has passed through the first stage which is the paganism text and the reviewer's response and I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. But honestly, the editor seems pretty nice to offer some specific comments on why the paper was desk rejected. Individual-Run-1347 • how long did you wait to get their addmitted email? Reply reply bean_kween • hi! i received an email on jan 30th that i was selected for an interview. Instead, they reject it outright based on an initial assessment. I am never reviewing for someone who doesn't not value the academics times. Lately, This subreddit is temporarily closed in protest of Reddit killing third party apps, see /r/ModCoord and /r/Save3rdPartyApps for more information. CSCareerQuestions protests in solidarity with the developers who made third party reddit apps. Then, when they do agree to review, the reviews almost always return late (we give reviewers a month in most cases but they have been turning reviews in 3 to 4 months late). Reddit. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. Has anyone had any experience with this? Am i getting (another) desk reject? Google search didn't help much. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. AS for increasing desk rejects, we desk reject very frequently. Expand user menu Open settings menu. And as someone basically in the same position as you, it does freakin suck. The next day we received a desk reject from the editor-in-chief as the handling I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. In the reviews option just above the list of items to review. The reason given is that the paper does not fit the scope of the journal despite the content being closely related. Mega Nav. My first paper also got rejected 3 times before settling on a new open access journal that is a sub-journal to a famous one. Some are selected as "Invite" and some are selected as "alternate". Osaloni Bankole . Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? peer-review; paper-submission; Share. I would email the managing editor or editorial Most journals "hide" the decision selections from the reviews they send, so you can get something that on the surface is positive, but the reviewer selected "reject" or "major revisions", and so the journal would reject. ). Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Following this, editorial team sent the paper to what appears to be the original reviewers, who now They also have like a 60% desk reject rate, and it's completely subjective based on whether the editor is interested or not, not any objective metrics. I don’t want to re-submit, but I thought it’s not fair to reject based on one referee. This decision is typically made if the manuscript is deemed unsuitable for the journal, either due to its content or failure to meet specific submission criteria. Does that mean desk rejection? I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Change it to open in Desktop mode. Don’t get too down on yourself, make sure you recognize what an achievement it is to get At one point the status was listed as "awaiting review", which I assume means it was sent out to reviewers. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Is it common for moderators to neither reject it or approve it? If so how much time after should its unofficially been rejected. Controversial. g. Look at the journal they suggested, what topics it covers, what I. I know of one PI who used to resubmit to journals after they rejected a paper (rejedcted after R&R though, mind you) and after he did extensive revisions. and try to send it there if it has comparable quality. If it isn't shown, it's most likely a reject. overzealous_labgnome • My longest review was 2 months without desk rejection and upon After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited Yup, agree. While they could already reject virtually any paper assigned to them, it's definitively easier if they don't have to bypass positive reviews, especially since this very behavior already caused heated conflicts in the last couple of years. Sign up . Improve this answer. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; I was rejected after a 7-hour Amazon interview #Amazonrecruiting I am soooooooooooo doownn I never really post here but I guess im looking to vent . Does this imply rejection? It is hard to say whether your paper will receive a desk rejection, but there is still some uncertainty about whether it will be sent for peer review. They have the team of editors and while one editor rejected it there are chances that another could in theory send it to the reviewers. Rejection is normal and can happen for various reasons, but most importantly "noise". Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. I am working on it, just hang on 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist c940. This plan We have to be mindful of reviewers time and try to avoid reviewer fatigue by sending out submissions that don't even meet the basic requirements. NOTE: Before creating a new account for a reviewer, use the reviewer I have never rejected a submission for not being able to find a reviewer. Top. Sort by: Best. Afe Babalola University. 17% that survived were rejected on the second or third round. naiculucian • This happened to me very recently. The worst part of the new change, though, is that you as an author have no control over the reviews. Then there shouldn't be any problem with you returning it! The researcher is doing what Prolific advises, to ask participants to Return their Submissions rather than give a rejection, so whatever you did must not have been bad enough for a rejection!. Most journal usually do not reconsider resubmission. r/AskAcademia A chip A close button. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. Do you actually receive an email advising you that your review has been rejected or is that your own Skip to main content. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. After two weeks, one of the reviews was complete. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. For me at least it goes back through all items I've reviewed Usually, if a submission is not a good fit for a specific journal or falls short of its standards, a decision of desk rejection is communicated to the author. The kind of review-in-public-view process that some publishers like EGU do is great. If it does not suit the journal, it will be rejected without review to begin with (desk rejection). thank you so much! i recently rejected my offer and accepted a different one so i’m hoping that helps someone out! Reply reply more reply More replies More replies. Old. Is it still possible to get desk rejected with this status? My paper is stuck since last week. Best. Reply reply FeelingAdept4723 • On it happened same for me in 21st for MS AI and got the admit for MS AI on 23rd. In that phase, we only rejected papers that received two sufficiently negative reviews that were also confirmed by the (senior) meta reviewers. Building an effective reviewer What does it mean when a manuscript status changes from "Awaiting reviewer selection" to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" ? I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago A desk rejection occurs when a paper gets rejected even before it has entered the peer review process. When I checked the link on the 16th of April, I saw that the status has changed from "Under Review" to "Review Complete" with the status date 16th of April with the following stats: Just got a straight-up desk rejection of a recently submitted paper. I am now even more anxious 😭. Share Add a Comment. The way the system is set we select a number of potential reviewers. If I got rejected without review, I would only try to resubmit to another journal of the same tier of impact factor if I felt they rejected it for arbitrary reasons. Has anyone had any experience with this? Am i getting a desk reject? Google search didn't help much. Reply reply More replies. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. 3 years ago # I submitted a paper, and got an immediate desk reject as “out of scope”. In the prior year, about 30% of the papers were on one of JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. Additionally, most journals have a place for reviewers to send private messages to editor along with the review, so sometimes they raise more private concerns I am an Editor with an Elsevier journal. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. If not, select another journal, there are plenty. Anyway, I submitted to an even better journal and got accepted. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. 2 accepted. My first paper also got rejected 3 times before settling on a new open access journal that is a sub-journal to a My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". Benzaim I am saying his inability to deal with it will force his hand (an unlikely but unavoidable scenario, increasing the chances of an unseen or I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal. All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. :-) Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. The fact that you are apparently seeing For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. You pay $2k, they review it. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. However, we have explained the statuses below: Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. This paper examines the features of some desk rejections and offers some guidelines that I got a paper rejected after nearly 1 year of revisions. This can happen when reviewers disagree, or in less common cases when all reviewers recommend "soft" rejection but the AE still sees potential. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. This happened to me once and the 2nd journal accepted with minor revisions. Don't worry, rejection is part of the process. So, you have some reason to hope. asked Mar 26, 2015 I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Hopefully you will get the admits. For many smaller journals, once it gets past the edotor's desk reject stage (into the assigning AE stage), and subsequently assigning reviewers stage, it is largely safe to say that it will get At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. r/AmazonVine A chip A close button. Should I interpret the comment as is ? My paper is a bit unusual in that it uses a In my experience (10+ years), I think 2 months is quite long to have the manuscript without it being in the hands of reviewers or already rejected by editor. That is crazy! I would be furious! What journal if you don't mind? I'd like to never submit there. my interview was feb 8th, and i received notice Rejection after review is almost surely because of the reviewers' decision, regardless on whether the topic of your paper suits their journal or not. Typically I've found success with that I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. !!! As soon my birthday coming! I wish acceptance for my birthday gift lol Reply reply We are happy to inform you that your paper was selected to proceed to Phase 2 of reviewing. Researchers also message participants via the internal messaging system, so as long as you check your messages you will see when/ if a rejection has been given to one of your submissions. a rejection notice may take longer than an offer. Most recent answer. Was it indeed a desk rejection, or was there a positive outcome? You could share either here or there. We do Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, From the description of the status change of your current submission, it seems that the manuscript had passed the admin check and the reviewer selection process had started. How many manuscripts are desk rejected, and how many are sent out for review? ASQ desk rejects around one-half of new submissions each year for lack of suitability or fit for the journal. And have selected one of my other admits. Publication At times, it may also be a reject-and-resubmit decision. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. Of course it depends on They select the peer reviewers. The reviewers may have no further . 1 rejected because the paper is out of scope of the journal. Author(s) can follow the evaluation of their article by using ScholarOne , in the Author Center. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating After 3 days, it shows "ADM Office: Awaiting Recommendation". However, the paper was on doing JOINs with TIME SERIES with GPUs. 2k 18 18 gold badges 199 199 silver badges 308 308 bronze badges. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; Like, my preprint gets a lot of attention but the submission was desk rejected for the third time today for the same reason, "lack of novelty. As a reviewer, I personally have zero empathy if i get a paper again that i I keep note of the journals that desk-reject my article without any explanation, and never submit to those journals again. Atm, it's best to keep an eye on everything Awaiting Review, and jump on any nasty red rejections as soon as you can. Now, a lot of papers are desk rejected by the editor because they're not a good fit for the journal or just downright terrible. blogspot. Rejection after peer review is based on whether your work is robust enough - in the view of the reviewers. Just need someone to explain where a past work's existence justifies why mine is not novel. They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). The editor-in-chief handled the manuscript. First time submitting there. Out of scope should be desk rejected, not after 3 rounds of revisions. Once you work If the manuscript does not match the journal's scope or does not meet the journal's standards, it may be returned without review or be desk rejected. But the decision is actually made already. Is such a long waiting period normal? In the past, we've passed the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I responded immediately with: "Honest mistake, first-time NeurIPS submitters! Please give us a chance. There's red dot that comes up when there Yesterday we received a desk rejection notice from NeurIPS because our paper is several lines over the 8-page limit. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. My ERB understands that I will ask them to help me with short turnaround submissions. Economist c9f0. If the paper is to be rejected at this point, a rejection letter is sent out and the file is closed. Or check it out in the app stores   I first got rejected for MSCS and today my status got updated from Awaiting Review to Awaiting Decision (for MSAI & MSDS). There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, then to Evaluating Recommendation. While the comments of Reviewer 1 was really helpful and suggest minor revisions (which all can be revised in around 30 minutes), Reviewer 2 comments was pretty critical and some of the things they said doesn't even make any sense. Log In/Register. Here the status Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision While such a quick change suggests that it may be a desk rejection, there may be some reason to hope. In such cases, the manuscript is not sent for peer review. I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and Peer review is gatekeeping, and it can be extremely unfair, but some amount of gatekeeping is essential to (i) maintain some minimum standard and (ii) keep research output under control. Paper rejection = Modify and Try again elsewhere. No other comments on methodologies and technical contents were given. We responded point-by-point to the new reviewers and resubmitted the paper. 3. Sea_Programmer3258 • This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. We addressed all of the comments very carefully and resubmitted. Take a day or two off, embrace this rejection process, enhance the paper, resubmit it either to the same journal (Please change the title and modify the paper so it would have a chance to be read by new reviewers and don’t be like my supervisor who insisted on submitting the paper to the same journal with the same title and got it rejected since that the editor was able to recognise When we contacted the assistant editor, things got moving and we got a “major revision” with rather positive, but brief comments from two reviewers. Follow answered Apr 19 I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. If they rejected you for sound reasoning, go lower impact right away. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I get asked frequently to review for them and just auto reject. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to be sent to the author(s). Some editorial systems give the Cell group, PNAS, etc all seem to have a lot of editorial independence, so desk rejections happen a lot faster; e. Can't wait any more! Reply reply It switched from awaiting review to in revie1 last month but now its back to awaiting review 💀 Reply reply Delicious-food7249 • Me tooooo! 😞 I’m also at January change to decision but few days later again review. Had a journal submit my paper to 3 rounds of major revisions only to be finally rejected. they will want to make sure the top choice accepts their offer before they cut you loose. So if it was an admit, then it'll show a Defer Acceptance section. You’ll probably know soon whether it In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Your manuscript has cleared desk screening I once had a paper "desk rejected" because an editor hit the wrong button and forgot to request a resubmission. When one of the Invited reviewers declines to undertake the review, the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . I also have personal contacts While it is always a bummer to have a desk rejection, especially from a journal you perceive to be a good fit, nothing you describe sounds unfair here. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. But this I didn't know about it for years lol. 2% of all the papers that were submitted make it to press. The in-between case, which seems to be your case (maybe?) is that the paper is "new" with a different ID, but is still sent to the same journal. But even if you double The portal status changes to Awaiting decision for a few hours before the decision is shown. Reply reply Prize_Win_5635 Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. After another two weeks I got the decision letter. Mine doesn't show the option "Defer my acceptance" (only shows these three: Withdraw my application, Verified test score inquiry, Add programa request) even though I have the "Awaiting Decision" status for almost 24 hrs now. Mine is awaiting reviewer scores after a couple weeks now. Q&A. Before that, tester was not able to fill Desk rejection occurs when the editor of a journal decides not to send a submitted manuscript out for peer review. If they do, they will surely mention it in there is no specific time frame for this. The review consisted of the following sentence: NeurIPS desk-rejects (papers passed over without review) has become "a super noisy process," complains a post in the Reddit Machine Learning group. Get what you can out of the reviewer comments and submit to the next journal - perhaps you need to An exponential distribution seems likely, so the mean and standard deviation would be the same, and the probability of a desk rejection later than 3 weeks is about 17%, if the mean time to desk rejection is 1. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others decline the invitation, however, Unfortunately, the review process has been incredibly frustrating. NeurIPS desk-rejects (papers passed over without review) has become “a super noisy process,” complains a post in the Reddit Machine Learning group. This year, despite two acceptances, we faced one rejection (with the fourth review missing) without clear reasons or useful feedback. A sudden No I tell them to fuck off. So (Fragomen) Did anyones status changed ‘Awaiting decision’ to ‘Selected’ or ‘Rejected’ after 5 pm EST? Share Add a Comment I submitted my manuscript 2 weeks ago to a Wiley journal that uses ScholarOne to manage submissions. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Now the status is awaiting DE decision. The Review and Decision Process . However, you have to be a very special breed to take a rejected paper and submit it unchanged to another conference. F. Select and open a message awaiting moderation. After waiting for 2 months for the paper to be under review, my paper got rejected just after 5 days of review. " To which we were Most reviewers do not check whether a paper got rejected before. 65. reddit's new API changes kill third party apps that offer I've submitted it 4 times now; twice it came back for revisions, and after I met the reviewers comments the editor still rejected it. I don't plan to take any action but I Almost by definition, the reviewer response is not added, because the reviewers should not be the same so that the paper can be given a fresh review perspective. Last time was the worst: 3 reviewers, 2 liked the paper and asked for minor revisions, but one hated the paper and advised against it, which got the paper rejected again. But we are According to the reviewer guidelines: SACs cross-check desk rejects: June 26 -- July 2 Does anyone have any information about Skip to main content. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. 4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Economist e5cc . Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer reviewers. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. I am new and confused about rejected reviews. Usually, those papers seem to be unanimously rejected, and for most part are low-effort for the reviewers. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. If the paper is really as badly written as you are saying, then most likely I would spend less than an hour in the review and reject it. Simply cut out the Conclusion. In addition, I have This is basically a new service where you can see how many reviewers were invited, how many accepted the invitations, and how many have completed the review. Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. Or, is it really not that uncommon that a paper does not get rejected right away, undergoes review processes everywhere it's submitted, but ends up not being published? It I'm an editorial assistant for a journal and ever since covid, getting reviewers to agree to review has been very hard. At the same time, badly written papers are low-effort for the reviewer. I'd like to know if anyone else got desk rejected by similar reasons. I do not review for them either, and I am petty enough to not cite work from those journals either. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external I would rather prefer an immediate desk rejection rather than just to sit and wait for a response for almost three months, knowing that it even hasn't reached reviewers yet. I've been rejected for grammar issues wherein the reviewer wrote like a kindergartner (not exaggerating). Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. Wait! It is not late yet. It was NOT desk rejected. As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. Write. Skip to main content Ask a Question. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Saying it was out of scope is just nonsense. Migrationsverket said they Usually there are things such as “desk rejects” or “wii i rejects”, in which something gets rejected for being so out of scope. Same Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. It could be a reject-and My review paper just got desk rejected a second time after waiting for 2 weeks. If so how much time after should its unofficially been rejected. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. What Skip to main content. Unfortunately, asides from that, a common complaint among the negative reviewers (it's usually split half and half in terms of positive and negative) is about the significance of the results in terms of the fact it does not push SotA by Probably means it will be desk rejected if it did not go out to reviewers. This can get sticky as there are shit reviewers out there. What is a Not necessarily. Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. Could the Associate Editor reject the manuscript at this stage? Either the desk editor (i. New. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Open comment sort options . Like everyone said, rejection is the norm and you should just submit it to another journal. I thought this status means that the editor is looking for available referees 3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 4b6b. Improve this question . uk has several really good posts about why papers are rejected, most of them are before peer review. I know I gotta pick up myself after every rejection/failure but it’s not easy. They apparently got 150% of last year's Thank you for your question. The editor decided to reject the manuscript. Journals have target acceptance rates ("pages to fill") that may influence this as well - for example, through I have not received a desk rejection but s. Kind of lottery. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts I submitted my manuscript 2 weeks ago to a Wiley journal that uses ScholarOne to manage submissions. Like literally wtf was that. I just submitted my third article the other day and now the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Recommendation means? I submitted a manuscript 3 days ago to a reputed journal. In Phase 1, each paper was assigned two reviewers, a meta reviewer and a senior meta reviewer. r/MachineLearning A chip A close button. Papers that did View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Get external, unbiased feedback, and find out why the paper appears so problematic to people not close to your work. Open in app. In my case, it always a stock comment like "This is a great paper but we unfortunately have to reject it because we have many paper submitted The status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting Ed decision" in a week's time. Follow edited Mar 27, 2015 at 21:13. e. Reply reply needfulsalsa • Journal of Statistical Software. It is so frustrating to do the hard work I wouldn’t say the reviewer was very negative, and I think I could address the concerns. Sign up I appealed the rejection and have currently been waiting 6 months for a decision on this . You may want to request an update to expedite the rejection. Prolific also suggests Partial Payments, usually if there was a technical problem on the researcher's end, so maybe that is what It's fairly common to see manuscripts get an R&R despite a reviewer recommending rejection. Open comment sort options. It means that it did not get desk rejected and went out for review to experts in the area. Keep in mind that PIs often have 5~7 projects at any given time so 1) yes it will hit harder for you than for them but also 2) you need to be the one pushing and be the last to give up, because they are not going to be as affected by Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript I have submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal (not *the* Nature though) and have been "Manuscript under consideration" for ten days - does anyone have any experience with this and then being desk rejected? I would have thought that Review and selection of manuscripts. I've also had editors desk reject because they didn't understand the fit between my paper and the scope of the journal, and have had to appeal that. TY for any thoughts! Share Add a Comment. After 3 days, it shows "ADM Office: Awaiting Recommendation". One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. As I'm currently awaiting a decision from the migration court, I have the right to reside here, however I have heard mixed accounts as to whether I would retain this right if I were to leave and re-enter Sweden at this time. Publishing reviews is good and it should be standard practice. " I haven't received a single proper rejection review and IDK what I might be doing wrong. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for What is the meaning of awaiting reviewer selection? Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Sometimes I feel overwhelmed by academia :( Share Sort by: Best. Is it possible no one ever really sees my post or do moderators have some kind of a Don't worry about it! Everybody gets rejected all the time, it's just the way it is. Bump 3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 15bc. Wrzlprmft ♦. According to the tracking link, two reviewers accepted to review the manuscript. This decision may normally take up to 2 weeks. ’ This must be a journal-specific descriptor for the AE Your paper got desk-rejected and the message was very clear, just because another journal thought it was worthwhile to send it out for review doesn't mean nature has to accept it. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. That does not seem to be the case, though! Good luck! Reply reply nguyentandat23496 • I also got desk rejected a lot so I understand your experience. it has etc. You submitted the article, the editor did not feel it was a good fit, and they chose not to forward to reviewers, which is a choice editors make when they feel confident the article either is We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. In your case, what may be happening is that the editor has looked at your responses to review, and in light of those criticisms and how well you can respond to them has decided the paper isn’t something they want to publish. Share. All we ask for is a chance at reviews. Remember, you MUST use Edge and you MUST open the mailbox in Desktop mode on the mobile device. Academicjournalpublishing. or, maybe it's just a paper that's not meant to be. Reviewer selection is as close to a lottery as it can get. I'm very protective of both my reviewers and authors by desk rejecting papers that should not be sent out to my reviewers so as to not waste anybody's time. Members Online • Icy_Usual7669 [D] "Desk rejected" for no reason --- the ML academic conference industry is becoming broken Discussion Submitted yesterday a paper to a ML conference. If it's at least getting reviewed then you know what to change/improve for next time around. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. And the AE decided to reject too. It's a balancing act. The longer you take to publish a paper, the less novelty it has, and the more time Those who have not yet received a decision from Northeastern University (MS CS), has your status changed from "Awaiting Review" to "Awaiting I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I wouldn't read much into it. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. , says awaiting review and reviewed. 7 weeks, unless no peer review is happening. Many reasons could have lead to this: reviewers often have quota, so if they can accept only 1 out of 3 paper, maybe you just competed with better paper; your paper could be not a foot fit for this conf/journal; your paper could be not good enough for this journal/conf. Add a Comment. you may have also been the first person to interview and the other candidates will take a week or more to complete their final interviews. Click on reviewed. In you options at top of the page (on mobile and using desktop on my mobile) you have vine items then reviews then orders ECT. However, I thought it possible that "review" in this case could also refer to an initial/internal review by the associate editors(s) for suitability. It happens and editors are absolutely human. Having two statuses for a single manuscript is uncommon. At least it seems the paper went out for review (and this wasn't a desk rejection). Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. But I would still say ask the editors to make sure, since they’ll be the ones to convey the info and deal with questions. Message for tester had to be: Click on field "-- select user--" and when dialog open, select user "User 1", then in field "PIN" fill pin "1234" (example) provided in App Access and click button "Login". In our previous two attempts, our paper was rejected, only to be accepted later by ICLR and NeurIPS. It will display the Approve/Reject tools in the upper part of the message, just like it does on a computer. 3 reviewers. Click on “Take Action. Or is this acceptable/to-be-expected? In your publishing experience would you email the editor and inquire? Or for journal editors, are emails regarding such author inquiries generally discouraged? I'm in a social We had to write very concrete instructions on how to fill login form with user select and pin input. I still like the journal papers. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. We only send manuscripts out for peer review that we believe have a good chance of being published. If the paper seems suitable for the journal, the A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. This journal was the the most appropriate for this manuscript. Most common form of rejection I've had is editors not feeling the paper is a good fit (basically journals with high impact factor who only want the sexiest stuff). "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Since it appears that the peer reviewers were contacted for review, it is possible that the manuscript is not desk-rejected Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. Of these, 48% were rejected after the first round of revision. The new reviewers recommended rejection based on points we argue were incorrect. The feedback we received was generic, asking Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. To be fair, usually out of scope papers are weeded out No, this is not assured merely by the fact that a paper has not been desk rejected. A colleague of ours had submitted an article two days prior and received a desk rejection about two weeks ago. However, I just noticed that the status of my Awaiting referee selection. But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. 7 weeks. I’d agree this is fine. A third possibility is that the editor could not find suitable peer reviewers for your paper, and is, Just be happy that you got rejected in a short time than they would hold it for months and then reject without review as well. Given the short amount of time this happened, is this most likely going to be a desk rejection? How to avoid desk rejection of a paper on novel findings? The real feedback I have is - ponder the possibility that, after multiple desk rejects, your problem may not be that your findings are too novel. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for concern, a further review should be sought. So you just move on with another journal. While such a quick change My review paper just got desk rejected a second time after waiting for 2 weeks. The Approve/Reject tools work the same way on browser. Here are the article statuses used by the system: · Awaiting AE Assignment It looks like it was rejected by the editor even before the peer review because of the scope of the paper. In total, 8. Some of the most cited papers in VLDB are on JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. my last PNAS rejection came in about a day or so. Sign in. I was rejected for not explaining the derivation of a highschool physics equation; this reviewer has had only 1 minor publication Many researchers awaiting a decision on whether their papers would make it to this year’s NeurIPS conference received word this week — but the notifications have provoked more questions than they answered. I would say we only reject 15% of all manuscripts that make it through the initial determination phase. zabulon_ • It’s probably waiting recommendation to go out for review. I taken longer to search for similar work or studies from other journals that demonstrate the same idea that I wish to One of my first papers was desk rejected twice, rejected after review, and then published in a journal with a higher IF and better name than the other 3. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. ydjrt mabn dpzc dxk ibuycks eiyrs ffqat qhlh pvoh xfvwpd