Vintage marantz vs yamaha. I have since sold the Marantz.

Vintage marantz vs yamaha marantz 2285 vs pioneer sx-1050 or marantz 2325 vs pioneer sx-1250/1980. Home entertainment systems don’t have to be prohibitively expensive. I for the most part agree. There is very, very little audible if any difference between Marantz and Denon. i Marantz SR7015 Yamaha RX-A6A; Marantz SR7015 was introduced in 2020. You will find good HKs We discover some of the RAREST HIFI ever made all in one place! Yamaha, Pioneer, Marantz, JBL & more!Visit Just Audio's Storehttps://ShopJustAudio. 1 inputs with 8K support. Denon AVR-X8500H vs Marantz vs Yamaha Build quality. I really like my newer ATI Amp & multiple Yamaha A/V Receivers but using both the Pioneer and I de-commisioned my mint Marantz receiver that was only doing tuner duties (plan to sell it) and looked for tuners. Agree, I owned products from both, there is no such thing as Marantz warm, Yamaha bright not if compared in pure direct mode. Marantz NR1509 vs Yamaha RX-S602. 1 receiver. You are completely on your own if you buy anything from Marantz which is part of Sound United. Marantz and Yamaha exhibit distinct design philosophies. This Integra I don't know about yet -- ther next higher level has Auro-3D. Discussion Trying to decide between these two. Dec 15, 2015 Marantz SR5015 vs Yamaha RX-A4A: Comprehensive Comparison Compare the Marantz SR5015 and Yamaha RX-A4A. It's a close call but I tip my hat to Marantz. However it had FAR better sound than the Yamaha R-S700 which replaced it - far more Bass for sure. Both are fantastic sounding. 5 to 4 for Marantz). 2 channel unit. Yamaha A-S301 Key Specs. , Marantz GmbH, Marantz France SAS, holding company Marantz Associates Corp. Marantz offers the best audiophile Onkyo and Yamaha make decent sounding modern receivers, but they really can't compete with the best vintage. Please surf around the site and check everything out, particularly the FAQ and the Tips and Tricks pages, which contain all kinds of little nuggets of This video is not sponsored. With respect to Marantz, the only one I ever owned was a 6100. Vintage Luxman vs Modern Marantz Vintage Luxman vs Modern Marantz. I believe their best ever tuner is some vintage Kenwood model that really looks impressive. I would say it sounds similar to a big 50 series pioneer, like a 1050/1250 or an onkyo tx6500/8500. www. 1 receiver for 20 years (still going strong at my sister's) and preferred it to a few other receiver I've owned (vintage Pioneer (x2), Rotel and a Denon Integrated). Pioneer SX-780 built from 1978-80 similar to what i owned in College and ta lower powered but sweet sounding Marantz 2230 built in early 70s. It produces 125 watts per channel into 8 ohms. Because Yamaha RX A6A is cheaper, this one certainly has an advantage and has slight better value for money. CD Player - Yamaha CD-S303 vs. 1 optimized audio. It seems to me that the Marantz has a crisp or cleaner sound than my old Yamaha. We are comparing 500. 2-ch AV receiver. It can be hard to compare the two as they're manufactured under a single label called Sound United. Yamaha and Onkyo are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry that produce high-quality receivers speakers, headphones, soundbars, subwoofers, and amplifiers. It retailed for $275. I will not however consider Denon or Marantz receivers. The midrange control is a nice touch as well. In all fairness the 2285B should be compared to the CR-810 or CR-820. The TX-900 is the quietest on weak stations. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM-10 and Yamaha A-S3200 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. lenjack I recall Yamaha passing Marantz by mid to late 70’s. I love the SR-8012 but I got wondering how the sound of the modern AVR equipment compares to a fully restored Marantz vintage piece. But I guess sound wise the Marantz should be more to your taste than the leaner sounding vintage Yamaha stuff. If you’re into articulate and warm sound at Depends on what vintage you're talking about really. Modern (NAD) vs. I was looking at a Marantz 2325 and had them play it on a pair of nice bookshelf speakers. I don't really want to spend over $500, but will if the right one comes up. ) From one extreme to the other it is all about speaker pairing and what sound suits your ears expectations. However, this portability comes at a price – these slim receivers do not give as much power as A rare moment. Marantz CD-52 MkII SE (1993) There were more versions of the CD-52 than you could shake a stick at, but a strong case could be made for the MkII SE being the best of the lot. Skip to main content. Marantz SR5015 vs Yamaha RX-A2A . Winner: Denon and Marantz are known for delivering high-fidelity professional and consumer-grade audio equipment, especially AV receivers. Crutchfield carries the Yamaha, and has an excellent return policy. 595$. Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2022 2:35 am . At the time I also had (and still do) a Sanyo TP 626. Dec 15, 2015 Marantz Vs Yamaha. Can the old AS-500 keep up with the Marantz PM6007. , Marantz UK Ltd. This all costs money, far more than you're willing to spend. Witness the I have a Yamaha CR-420. Sansui with the Definition Series and AU integrateds. The performance is natural and accurate with progressed sound and heavy bass. Crisp, clean uncolored sound. If your focus is on price, Yamaha RX-A8A offers better value for money. And do not forget, yamaha has balanced xlr for Different Yes! Better depending on what you’re expecting. Most vintage brands had good, better, and best stuff. i kept the yamaha for its channel separation vs the others, the marantz is also ho hum even having the good internals/xt32 etc and the x4500 was the close 2nd behind the yammy. I've had my Yamaha RX-A2020 for a long time and love the amp but just upgraded to a Denon x4700h for the new features. 2 Professional Surround Sound. If you want vintage retro looks and sound, get the vintage Marantz. Marantz 8B One of many, now legendary designs from Marantz audio engineer Sid Smith, the 8B can be considered the amplifier (35Wpc) that contemplated the modern era of the high end. Depending on the music Agree, I owned products from both, there is no such thing as Marantz warm, Yamaha bright not if compared in pure direct mode. Yamaha and Marantz are both of good I am still working on my complete install and waiting on cables due this weekend. I know 2. The NAD has the features you want, and is a better amplifier than either the Marantz or Yamaha in my opinion. I recall Yamaha passing Marantz by mid to late 70’s. Pioneer Vs Yamaha Comparison Table. Inside was a transformer that could carry a higher current, along with several high-spec components in Here both the Marantz PM6005 and the Yamaha A-S501 were used to be priced around 500€, maybe the Yamaha a bit less, but thanks mainly to the Brexit (the Pound fell down to 1,15€) and the release of the new model for the Marantz, the PM6006, both were available on Amazon. I would consider a nice used/vintage 2ch The Marantz Model 30 is clearly a speaker-friendly amplifier. Denon builds the world’s first 13. 60 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC Curious about the difference in sound and build quality of vintage receivers like marantz 2220 series, sansui 2000 series, vs modern yamaha, marantz, or sony DN series for the purposes of home stero sound and music listening purposes. The Pioneer will take some strong haggling on my part and will need some internal work (not sure how much) to match the value proposition of the Marantz in my humble opinion. Depends on which modern as well. Denon makes a very nice receiver and there uper lines have more flexability than most other receivers. Particularly with the Marantz as the onboard crossover is fixed at 100Hz if I recall. Yes, they look cool too. I'm thinking about connecting an old Marantz 140 amplifier to the I am pretty pumped to put this Yamaha A S2200 and Marantz Model 30 comparison together. Marantz is really just a marked up Denon, made by the same company. our rating But the bass control was just so lacking compared to the new Yamaha. The thing that affects sound from receivers is 95% the calibration IMO. Plus, Yamaha is just fun to say MARANTZ, a name synonymous with high-fidelity audio. My main system is a mix of old and new, an MC500 amp, C2300 preamp, MR74, MCT 500, D150. I have Yamaha A8A right now but my friend says Marantz SR8015 is way better than my A8A. This unbiased Marantz SR5015 vs Yamaha RX-A2A comparative study finds that the amplifier performance of these two models is almost the same. Onkyo Build Quality. You will get a better understanding of the design, channels, video features, audio capabilities, and connectivity of these products after reading this Marantz SR8015 vs Yamaha RX-A6A analytical study. It has been in the business for more than 60 years, making numerous legendary pieces, from amplifiers to industry-leading CD players. comBran The Marantz 2325 came out around 1974 with a list price of $799. The difference will be in features, user interface, and the room EQ system. It’s not just marantz. And unless it has changed Yamaha and Denon are made by the same people, ie Nippon Electric. The Mac won for SQ, but the Marantz with the blue lights and the smooth as silk fly wheel tuner exuded cool. our rating | 26 Feb 2024 Comparison Denon vs Yamaha Receivers. Have Yamaha T-70,T-80,TX-400,TX-900;Pioneer F-99X,F447and Kenwood KT 8300. Marantz Cinema 40 Yamaha RX-A8A; Marantz Cinema 40 was introduced in 2022. Yamaha A-S501 Key Specs. However, you can buy the Yamaha model for $500 less than the Marantz version. Marantz PM6007 vs. Yamaha had to me leaner sound, which they touted as “natural”. Vintage tube sound at its best. I am in the process of weaning off the vintage integrated amplifiers - getting ready to unload a few. Models from Marantz, Sony, Kenwood, Pioneer, Yamaha, etc. Any thoughts on Yamaha vs Marantz? Experience the ultimate amplifier showdown as we compare two classic amps in one room, playing the same song, on the same turntable and speakers. In this article, we compare two top-tier AV receivers: the Marantz Cinema 50 and the Yamaha RX-A6A. I was looking at the Marantz 7015 too. The store has plenty of vintage receivers in stock, as well as a few recent receivers and lots of great speakers to play the receivers through. Especially at the higher end. Marantz Model 50 is a Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the A-S801 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. 100 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC Most vintage brands had good, better, and best stuff. Thread starter crsmith; Start date Mar 13, 2019; Tags marantz yamaha crsmith Established Member. my other two systems are MC30 s MC240, C28, C26, and an MX130. Yamaha A-S301 Purchasing EU/UK Hey everyone - just bought my first pair of speakers QA 3020i and now looking for my first amp. Anyone ever compare using a vintage Marantz receiver as a preamp to a modern Adcom preamp? I'd like to have a Vintage 2238 receiver on display in the living room along with the imitation vintage speakers and hide the muscle in the closet, but I can do without and stash the Adcom in the closet as well if there's a notable difference. I've always liked AKM dacs. The Marantz Cinema 30 vs Yamaha RX-A8A. It is equipped with 7 channel amplifier with 50 W (8 Ω, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 2 channel driven) power per channel and is capable of 7. Audio Research 76A Featuring a complex, regulated power supply, and a pentode output stage, it coaxed 75Wpc from a pair of 6550 Marantz NR1510 comes with 6 HDMI inputs. There is no universal answer, there is only endless debate. Yamaha TSR- 7850; Marantz 4K UHD Receiver SR5014; Onkyo TX-NR676 7. The Yamaha T-80 the best reception followed closely by the KT 8300 and TX-900. Joined Feb 17, 2006 Messages 64 Reaction score 13 Points 40. 12 reasons to shop with us. The Marantz series which includes the NR1200, NR1711 and NR 1510 are ideal for smaller spaces with less cabinet room. The design of A2A looks more attractive. Which one comes out on top? Watch The HK430 is one of the best sounding (and looking) vintage amps I know. In this article, we will explore the features, performance, and key differences of Onkyo, Denon, and IMHO these debates, Yamaha vs Marantz or Gear A vs. Great point. If you’re looking for a nice home entertainment system at a reasonable price, When it comes to purchasing a home cinema system, the As far as the entire Yamaha vs Denon vs Marantz vs Pioneer thing. 5% well that’s what I’ve done with a 1974 Yamaha amp which having got to try really is a keeper , vintage gear can be so addictive sounding This video shows you how to clean the faceplate of a vintage audio receiver or amplifier. Uses an AKM 4490 DAC. 2 channel AVRs with Atmos and DTS/X. The three brands are pretty similar when it comes to the build quality, and you I heard from people that remember that pricewise Yamaha and Marantz were comparable at their time and there was no clear preference as we have now of Marantz over Curious about the difference in sound and build quality of vintage receivers like marantz 2220 series, sansui 2000 series, vs modern yamaha, marantz, or sony DN series for the purposes I have a few vintage 70's Marantz Receivers that I've picked up over the years (2226B, 2252, 2265B). There is an fm tuner info site that has ratings and recommendations. I aim to review and compare these devices to find the more reasonable option based on I've never compared a Yamaha and a Marantz side-by-side, so I'm not really sure of the difference in sound quality. Of the two the Sanyo was the clear winner so the Marantz went on Craigslist Brands: Pioneer, Marantz, Kenwood, Hitachi, Sanyo, Technics, Sony, JVC, Yamaha, etc WPC: 40-60 Price Range: $300-$400 Era: Mid to late 70s Sound Characteristics: Clean, crisp, airy, open, musical (does not have to be all these) Thanks in advance! it looks like you have that Cherry Vintage Audio shop - I'd go over there and demo some of what Marantz NR1607 Yamaha RX-V6A; Marantz NR1607 was introduced in 2016. I have looked at the various sites that have user reviews such as Crutchfield and Amazon and Yamaha consistently has much higher ratings than Marantz (5 stars vs 3. 30W vintage Marantz sounds like 75-100W of a modern high-quality receiver simply because the difference in the size of the power supply and the current maintained on the motherboard and circuit. - 1967 - Model 18 solid-state receiver equipped with FM tuner and oscilloscope ; 2x 35W. Audio Research 76A Featuring a complex, regulated power supply, and a pentode output stage, it coaxed 75Wpc from a pair of 6550 I have owned marantz, kenwood, yamaha, sony, onkyo, proton, harman kardon, and denon equipment and I think they all have different strengths and weaknesses. 8K/60Hz and 4K/120Hz Passthrough on Yamaha RX-V4A: All inputs pass up to 8K 50/60Hz and 4K 100/120Hz 4:4:4 video signal. Change. The synergy is there and things sound the way I expect in each system. Marantz was much better in the tube era. I The Marantz CINEMA 60 is a 5. Marantz Denon receivers are still up for the contest against other well-rooted brands in terms of build quality. Both receivers have 7. No need to integrate if you just buy new. Marantz used to be on of the best music receiver in the day. 95. Marantz SR4000 (1980) Vs. Vintage (Marantz) Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by brad1987, Dec 16, 2022. It is equipped with 11 channel amplifier with 140 W (8 Ω, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 2 channel driven) power per channel and is capable of Innovative Audio is one of the few places in the world where setting up a test of old vs. Yes, technology is shared between the Marantz and Denon brand (HDMI boards for example) yet they still have their own propietary technology per brand Marantz SR8015 Yamaha RX-A6A; Marantz SR8015 was introduced in 2020 and represented a flagship model of a manufacturer. My new one is doing just fine. 4K/60Hz Passthrough on Marantz NR1510: All inputs pass up to 4K 50/60Hz 4:4:4 video signal. Marantz and Yamaha are well-respected brands in the audio industry, known for their commitment to audio excellence and advanced features. , and subsidiary Marantz Yamaha R-N803 vs A-S801 vs equivalent Marantz for the ELAC DBR62? I'm planning to get my first setup for mainly classical/jazz and also a general AV (Netflix, plex etc. I notice the Marantz sr 7012 states I've heard both the entry level Marantz and Yamaha integrated amps a few times with different speakers and I would say both are quite good. This in and of itself isn't that great a difference but many of the Marantz AVRs are riddled with one star reviews with problems that include DOA, need to reset In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . 00:00-01:54 Yamaha vs Marantz; 01:54-03:10 History; 03:10-05:16 Line-up of AVRs; 05:16-13:00 Sound Quality; 13:05-16:08 MusicCast Introduced in 1980 the Marantz SR-1000 was a budget minded receiver that produced 20 watts per channel. Kenwood, Toshiba, luxman, technics, Yamaha, denon, Sony and many more had flagship models that are as good or better. Winner: Yamaha RX-A8A. I don't think there's a big difference in the dacs or phono inputs. Unless someone has a better idea dac wise. Vintage Marantz products sell at a premium based on the reputation of their very early days. You may want to compare the CR-2020 to the Marantz 2330B, I think they were in the same price range back in the late 70's. PENG Audioholic Slumlord. Please consider purchasing Marantz or Yamaha through the Crutchfield links below if you aren't in the Southern California area. UK. He had an Akai reel-to-reel and large Advents. It would have to be less then 200 dollars cdn though. ; 4K Upscaling on A summary of all recent vintage receiver and amplifier reviews. Yamaha has a pre out/in loop for the mains where this application would also be appropriate. In conclusion, both the Marantz CINEMA 60 and the Yamaha RX-A4A are premium AV receivers that offer outstanding audio performance, advanced features, and extensive connectivity options. Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:45 pm Posts: 4259 Location: Richmond Hill, ON, CA cvandaele wrote: What intrigues me about the marantz is the arc HDMI in which would allow tv connectivity and reduce the need for multiple remotes. Old hearsay got passed around and around, that biased people prior to their auditioning, that's probably why, or dealers failed to demo them in pure direct mode. The Denon/Marantz do support 4 ohm all around compared to 6 for Yamaha (4 on fronts), yes. The 2220 I love the sound of vintage Pioneer gear (fully restored gear that is) and the Marantz seemed to offer "new" components that best replicated the "vintage sound". I like vintage myself - my main integrated amp is a Sony Vfet. Now, let us make the final verdict on Marantz SR8015 vs Yamaha RX-A8A. Yamaha R-N803 vs A-S801 vs equivalent Marantz for the ELAC DBR62? I'm planning to get my first setup for mainly classical/jazz and also a general AV (Netflix, plex etc. Sure, Yamaha has the RX-S602 as a compact option, but Marantz has a whole line of those. I've read that Yamaha's are more detailed/analytical in their sound; whereas, Marantz is known more for it's But I guess sound wise the Marantz should be more to your taste than the leaner sounding vintage Yamaha stuff. I've loved both Yamaha and Denon for a long time. I like the sound of 80's gear more than 70's and find the it to be quite similar between good 80's stuff and good modern gear. 1 isnt active yet on the Yamaha and needs an update but I dont have a 2. Eventually if the dac on my Yamaha RX-V doesn't cut the mustard and the onboard dac on the Yamaha 303 isn't up to snuff I would consider an external dac like the Topping D10s . The Yamaha is closer to your budget and puts out a lot more power than the Marantz. Many entry-level home entertainment system lines exist that are easy to fit into your budget and perform admirably. What I find funny is that if you look at reviews online, people are like "This Marantz is an awesome turntable!" And then, "That's a low end Yamaha turntable, meh. It can be hard to compare the two as they're manufactured under a single label Well I pulled the plug on isolation spikes and the Yamaha. If you want superior sound quality, get the Yamaha and a phono pre. 100W vs 95W means nothing. Found a great deal on a rare B & K TS-108 tuner that sounds awesome. onepixel. Both the Marantz Cinema 50 and the Yamaha RX-A6A are designed to deliver immersive sound and Took the plunge into two Vintage 1970s receivers. I use the Pioneer SA-9100. It sounded sublime to me. The garden variety receivers were better than the rest. 4 maximum channel processing. I'm pretty much considering Kenwood KA, Pioneer SA, Yamaha CA, or if I find the right one an Accuphase E-202. 00? Marantz also happier with 4ohms setting at higher levels. Most of the use But the bass control was just so lacking compared to the new Yamaha. It has 1 output. I would certainly consider buying a vintage Marantz in the future, but more for a collection piece than a working amp. Supercharged Song Towers, Oppo BDP-203, Anthem MRX-520, LG 65 in C2 OLED The Marantz 2220 was an entry level model in 1973 but was still a very good performing receiver which retailed for about $300. Marantz vs Yamaha The $7499. com I'm a fan of Denon/Marantz and Audyssey but in this case I think I'd actually pick the Yamaha. Marantz PM8006; Luxman 38; By Mark McDermott September 14, 2022 in Stereo Amplifiers & Pre-Amps Share It has the loudness function and sounds super rich and soulful. Both receivers have similar power output—the Marantz CINEMA 60 delivers 90W Marantz warm and rich to Yamaha's flat and critical (I agree with this description. It takes the price from $1,000 for a 75 - 100wpc receiver right down to $500. As a comparison I had them plug in a not-cheap Yamaha HT receiver, thinking the Marantz would embarrass it. It’s got enough power to deliver a deep and wide sound stage that’s appropriate in a larger space but might not have quite enough oomph to blow your 808 kick drums through the neighbor’s walls. As both have superb receivers it is sometimes become difficult to choose the right one. It was discontinued some time around 1976. I was underwhelmed by the vintage Marantz I heard, but maybe it was bad luck. I mostly use the Yamaha for listening to Flac files from my Mac and it sounds terrific through the onboard DAC. USA . I got my Marantz 2245 in 70's and always loved its warm (tube like sound) about 12 years ago i started trying other SS brands Pioneer, Sansui, Yamaha, Concept but i always liked the warm sound Marantz receivers more, I got a tube phono pre amp and liked how it sounded and finaly decided it was time to get a tube amp and picked up a Marantz 8B and was hooked There is a huge difference between speakers even when you pay hundreds for a single speaker or a pair of two. that said the Marantz does have lots of highs without getting shrill whereas the Pioneers can get ice picky. Features When I bought my first stereo system, I did a home audition between a Marantz 2270 receiver & a Mac MA-6100 integrated. The Denon AVR-X8500H front side is made of aluminium. It is equipped with 11 channel amplifier with 140 W (8 Ω, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 2 channel driven) power per channel and is capable of However, you can buy the Yamaha model for $500 less than the Marantz version. Yamaha RX-V4A comes with 4 HDMI 2. Audiolab 6000CDT. 2 channels of amplification, 100W/8Ohm power, and support Dolby Atmos and DTS:X surround sound formats. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison between two of their flagship AV receivers: the I have a Yamaha CR-420. 08% 2ch drive) HDMI features: 14 Mar 2024 Yamaha vs Marantz Receivers Comparison. USA. So one HDMI cable is used to transfer audio signal in both directions. Overall, Yamaha RX-A2A offers better value for money. Features Pioneer Yamaha; Sound Quality: Smooth and high-quality sound. Superscope sold the Marantz brand to Philips Electronics in 1980, so the SR line may be the first one produced under Philips although most of the design must have occurred under Superscope. V. Marantz Cinema 50 Yamaha RX-A4A; Marantz Cinema 50 was introduced in 2022. I love it for movies and 5. Audiophiles and home theater enthusiasts often find themselves in a dilemma when choosing between these brands. Yamaha AX-900 is a vintage monster(17Kilo), one of the top end from Yamaha, have a lot of features, very well built, but the same time Marantz PM-66SE KI, even is only 7 kilo, and not so features(no tone controls!) is one of the Marantz top audiophille amplifier. 1 setup. Final Thoughts. I may have had a faulty Marantz (or maybe even just the mic?) but the experience was enough to make me never consider Marantz or Audyssey Sold through Nippon Gakki in Japan (aka Yamaha) in 1967, with wood enclosure. In this article, we’ll put all the three brands head to head, and see which brand will remain the last man standing. HKs are perhaps somewhere in the middle, also very good vintage pieces. Post subject: Re: Yamaha s1200 vs marantz 40n. Never owned a Marantz before and always wanted one. Feb 15, 2012 I have only heard a vintage Marantz when my brother had his system in the 1970's. I have a 2270 in my office. I am a long time collector of vintage stereo gear like receivers, speakers, amps, turntables Marantz 8B One of many, now legendary designs from Marantz audio engineer Sid Smith, the 8B can be considered the amplifier (35Wpc) that contemplated the modern era of the high end. Analog Pre-Outs: Marantz Cinema 60 and Yamaha RX-A4A have 7. Do you agree? Leave a comment!Some product links are affiliate links wh Having owned Denon, Marantz, Sony, and Yamaha receivers/processors, my bias is still 1) Denon or Marantz when you have well positioned speakers 2) Yamaha or Sony when you don’t have well positioned speakers and benefit from extra spatial processing (for movies). Today in the used market many buyers do not know the Marantz history. comBran Marantz NR1607 Yamaha RX-V6A; Marantz NR1607 was introduced in 2016. 1 controller so it should have all the 2. 2 maximum channel processing. It’s known for more than adequate warm power, a I still own and use a 1972-vintage Marantz 2230 receiver in my living room. I was frankly less than impressed. In this article, I selected some of the coolest receivers from Marantz and Yamaha, ranging from entry-level models to high-end ones. They have been in the industry for over 5 years producing amplifiers, CD players, turntables, and other musical Marantz Cinema 70s and Yamaha RX-V6A support Audio Return Channel (ARC) which allows the compatible TV to send audio signal to the a/v receiver through the same HDMI cable which is used to send audio and video signals to the TV. The Yamaha seems to have a more forward sounding tune while the Marantz is more laid back. Top. The Marantz lists at 599 and Yamaha can be had for 399 or less. I have not, but have read a lot of good things about them. - Kenwood Supreme 1 Marantz Europe B. People tend to look at their build quality first when buying expensive devices. Marantz products often feature a sleek and elegant aesthetic with a classic touch, blending well with any home décor. I have since sold the Marantz. Vintage cars and audio equipment require periodic But the real difference audio characteristic wise is with the openness and detail of the sound of the Yamaha compared to my NAD. They will be equally music friendly. Of the two I tend to like the sound of Marantz gear over Yamaha. So I thought I would take it to the boards so to speak. Historically, Sony had some of the best HDMI CEC if you also have a Sony TV. The only other thing I might look at is a Marantz, a CD 6007 also plays from front usb. Maybe it's just with the particular brands i chose to compare. . g. 5. as far as Marantz vs pioneer in a very general “house sound” sense. 95 Yamaha A-S3200 integrated costs three times as much as the $2499 Marantz Model 30. The Yamaha My two favorite receivers of the 70's, my Marantz 2275 and the Yamaha CR1020 (which I've never had the pleasure to own but WILL someday). ; 4K Upscaling on Well I pulled the plug on isolation spikes and the Yamaha. Yamaha A-S701 Key Specs. zkelectronics. It’ll drive inefficient speakers with ease, and the feature set is robust. This Marantz SR8015 vs Yamaha RX-A6A comparative study discusses everything you must know about these two models. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Yamaha A-S501 and Marantz PM6007 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I just scored the Yamaha CR-1020 and my wife and I are sharing/comparing it against the Marantz 2270. I am loathe to say Marantz or Yamaha is better of the two choices because of the reviews and attention they both receive. I like the warmer tone of vintage Marantz but I am looking to upgrade to gain more resolution, detail, stage width & depth and dynamics. Maybe Onkyo/Denon would have offered no preference to me. I personally do not call that warm. Pioneer stuff Yamaha overall is not so warm like Marantz, but is very fast, clean. They're both solid units. I did own a Yamaha 5. Pioneer, Sansui, Marantz, Kenwood, Yamaha all have a following amongst vintage lovers. But to be fair, I own a CD6005 and love the sound. Right now, I am running a set of Polk Lsim 705's with a Marantz 2252B. Gear B are no different than CDs vs. Marantz vs Pioneer – a battle of histories. Marantz with the 500, 510M, 300DC, and 1300DC. Cheapaudioman on YouTube has said he could almost dial an A-S801 to sound similar to his beloved vintage Yamaha CR-800, so take that for what it's Solid-state Marantz, vintage or otherwise, is not a part of my collection, but I'm biased towards vintage in general. Either will work for your current speakers but the Yamaha will be better if you upgrade later on. However, with anything vintage, be it cars, audio equipment, or something else, you'd better be able to fix it yourself or be able to pay someone competent to do it for you. Marantz On these pages, you'll find a great deal of information, as well as images for Marantz Receivers, Tuners, Amplifiers, Preamplifiers, Consoles, Integrated Amplifiers, Turntables and Tape Decks. lenjack A summary of all recent vintage receiver and amplifier reviews. All vintage gear has more than doubled in price in the last few years, sometimes tripled or quadrupled. While we will cover a wide range of their Marantz Cinema 60 and Yamaha RX-A2A support Audio Return Channel (ARC) which allows the compatible TV to send audio signal to the a/v receiver through the same HDMI cable which is used to send audio and video signals to the TV. With the Yamaha a slight change in either hardware or software seems to make a noticeable difference. Digital. Quien sonará mejor? Escucha a los 4 y tu decides The choice between the two largely depends on your personal preference and the type of music or content you primarily enjoy. I just made a similar decision and went with Yamaha. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at the sound quality, durability, price, and so on. I also don't draw a large distinction between receivers and integrated amps -- the difference in the internal amps inside of receivers between vintage and new isn't that much different than the internal differences between old and new integrated amps. Marantz and Sansui are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Reasons to pick one over the other? Is the Marantz worth the added cost? I do see it has more pre-outs compared to the Yamaha, would that be better or is it enough to just add an amp for the fronts and sub? Vintage home theater 2. None of them had been recapped and none of them were sounding that good compared to the Yamaha C-70 that went on the fritz. There are a lot of 70s vintage receivers that seem to be well regarded and can be purchased reasonably (monster receivers with mega watts will cost ya). ? NAD 316BEE V2 or (Fully Restored) Marantz 2230. If i had compared Marantz and HK, maybe i wouldn't have heard a difference. It really is an extremely noticeable difference. automojo In this review, we will be comparing PM-10 and A-S3200, two Integrated Amplifiers from Marantz and Yamaha. The Marantz has been fully refurbished while the Yamaha is original condition. See my post on Denon, Sound United, Marantz. Choosing the best speaker in a market marred with a mix of vintage and modern speakers from a myriad of manufacturers may not be I can't tell you how a vintage Marantz receiver would compare soundwise to a contemporary Yamaha integrated amp, but I have heard very good things about the Yamahas, like the A-S801 or the A-S1200. Harman Kardon 430 (1973-1976 Phono Input: There is an MM phono input on Marantz Cinema 60 and Yamaha RX-A4A with built-in phono stage for connecting the moving magnet cartridge output of the turntable directly to the receiver. Conclusion. It supports Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, passes 4K/60Hz and upscales up to 4K 30/25/24p 4:4:4 video signal. 00 vs. The high end offerings were awesome as well. Marantz NR1510 comes with 6 HDMI inputs. Rotel CD11 Tribute vs. Marantz SR7015 is approximately 18% more expensive as compared to its competitor. Comparing Yamaha AVENTAGE RX-A6A and Marantz SR8015? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. uk at about 320€. Read alot about reliability issues with Marantz, Which one is better: Marantz or Yamaha? Which one has better sound for movies, Yamaha or Marantz? Which of the two receivers will work with HDMI? All of these questions and more will be addressed in this article. Free 2-day shipping to Iowa See details. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Yamaha A-S301 and Marantz PM6007 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. 95. Dealers choice on it really. See the comparison video above for our thoughts about Marantz vs Yamaha surround sound receivers. 1 issues that the new Marantz have. In particulate the SR8015, with its improved measured performance is just not You can also try the Integrated's. Focus on the features and connectivity that matter most for your usage. The Yamaha CR-1020 is typically priced between $800 and $1,500, depending on its condition. I have tried using receivers as preamps. Winner: Yamaha RX-A2A. Sure like connectivity of Marantz. But if you come this far you already find out what you actually need and know all kinds of Marantz and Sansui are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Power supply died and replaced with a Yamaha 3080. Yamaha and Marantz have Auro-3D. Only one of the three references I posted was comparing receivers, the other two are integrated amps. Pioneer had some truly amazing integrated amps and separates (spec series, etc), and the x3x series (like yours) imo was some of the most listenable gear on the market. My backup amp is a vintage Marantz Any receiver from Marantz, Denon, Yamaha, Onkyo, Pioneer, or Sony in the $300 to $800 range will serve most buyers very well. ) The design philosophy of the wxc50 is integration of vintage/old audio equipment with music cast. The Marantz model outperforms A8A in all aspects except amplifier power and multi-zone features. To moot, a member is selling a Marantz vintage receiver which has been recapped and serviced for $425. So, nostalgia plays a big roll for me. In this review, we will be comparing Model 30 and A-S1200, two Integrated Amplifiers from Marantz and Yamaha. The MkII was essentially an audiophile player for the budget market. The Marantz 2230 and 2245 have caught my interest since they’re not too astronomically priced yet. Yamaha RX-V1800 Receiver When I had the Marantz it didn't seem to matter what changes I made it always sounded the same ie: crap. In this article, we compare two high-end AV receivers: the Marantz Cinema 40 and the Yamaha RX-A6A. Marantz Cinema 30. co. There's also a marantz 1250, how would that one stack up vs the Sansui or Yamaha? In this review, we will be comparing A-S701 and PM6007, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Marantz. I still own and use a 1972-vintage Marantz 2230 receiver in my living room. some of the other brands discussed. The top of my list is the Denon avr2309 (around AU$1300-$1500), but I'm after opinions on which of these three brands are considered the most "musical"; that is, the receiver most likely to do a good job of two-channel music. Top picks for me Yamaha T-70 with T-80 Hello I have a fairly entry level, yet nice sounding Yamaha RX-V685 7. Yamaha A-S1200 - Philharmonic Audio BMR Towers - Fluance RT83 TT & SAE1000E MC Cart Both lines have an esteemed history, great steps through their AVR line-up and compelling reasons to buy both brands. Yamaha HT vs Yamaha 2-channel I've had 3 modern Yamaha home theater receivers Denon and Marantz are known for delivering high-fidelity professional and consumer-grade audio equipment, especially AV receivers. The Yamaha A-S501 is a good amplifier for the money but the volume control has some pretty big steps at low volume levels, just as the old A-S500 did, and if you tend to listen at lower volumes sometimes, this can make it very difficult to subtly adjust Marantz and McIntosh are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. It's kinda like comparing a 69' I did find a comparison of the Marantz vs Yamaha and it seems that Marantz has less power drop over multiple channels of amplification. I'm probably about to get the 7011 but I'm also interested in the 3070. In any case, let's have it: In general, Marantz is better for music while Denon is better for home theaters. new receivers is easy. My recapped marantz 3600,and sx950 get honorable mention but no cigar. 85 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC All of the turntables mentioned in this post (Yamaha, Marantz, Craig, Lafayette) as well as the Pioneer 1150 and a Sanyo deck are the same CEC made deck, apparently. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz Model 30 and Yamaha A-S1200 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. The Marantz is offered at a really good price and in working order. Unfortunately, that requires a technician to open it up, remove the old capacitors, and solder new ones where the old ones were. When it comes to high-end AV receivers, Marantz and Yamaha are renowned brands known for their exceptional audio performance and advanced features. Marantz SR8015 Yamaha RX-A8A; Marantz SR8015 was introduced in 2020 and represented a flagship model of a manufacturer. Different Yes! Better depending on what you’re expecting. NAD 316BEE V2 23 vote(s) 60. Get FREE 2-day shipping and free lifetime tech support with your order. Marantz will offer more depth lower and midrange than the Yamaha. And if you decide to give vintage 60's tube receivers a try, add the Sansui 1000A to the list. I only have a 5. In terms of my opinion I have formed it from owning both makes. Canada UK, Europe and Russia Australia Taiwan Brazil and Central and South America China Korea Asia and General amazon. Both brands exceeded expectations. Sounded great but never had the depth. 100 watts RMS into 8-ohms We discover some of the RAREST HIFI ever made all in one place! Yamaha, Pioneer, Marantz, JBL & more!Visit Just Audio's Storehttps://ShopJustAudio. 85 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC would like the input of anyone who owns or have had real experience with vintage marantz and pioneer receivers, i. Yamaha RX-V1800 Receiver Our thoughts on whether its a good idea to replace capacitors in vintage electronics. I actually run modern Marantz and vintage Luxman right now, in 2 of my 3 systems. Build quality Anyone ever compare using a vintage Marantz receiver as a preamp to a modern Adcom preamp? I'd like to have a Vintage 2238 receiver on display in the living room along with the imitation vintage speakers and hide the muscle in the closet, but I can do without and stash the Adcom in the closet as well if there's a notable difference. 2 channel receiver while the Yamaha surpassed its competitor, as their RX-A4A is a 7. It is equipped with 9 channel amplifier with 110 W (8 Ω, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 2 channel driven) power per channel and is capable of 11. My Marantz 2230 has been a pleasure to enjoy, though the tuner's blue lights need replacement and it could doubtless use a bit of intelligent refurbishing after 24 years. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz Model 50 and Yamaha A-S801 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I have a cheap rotel outboard pre-amp that out does all my vintage phono stages. 395$. Compared with a similarly-priced Yamaha AS-2100 which was also on hand, the latter lost out on absolute detail retrieval but has more richness and weight Marantz moved the stereo indicator light to a spot above the dial scale and added an FM tuning meter in its place on the 2235B. I have KEF R7 speakers and 11. Other stellar receivers from that era are: Marantz 2325, 2330, 2285, Sherwood 9910, Nikko NR 1415, Sansui Eight Deluxe, 881, G-9000, Kenwood 9600, Technics Sa-700 (Or 800,1000), Luxman R-1070,R-1120 I own about 50-60 of these vintage receivers and these are my faves. I didn't stop at Luxman or Marantz, and it was a fun journey. The Marantz claims 100Wpc into 8 ohms and 200Wpc into 4 ohms (class-D). The CR1020 you mentioned - I have never heard a marantz that sounds like it. Marantz 2270 (1971-1975) Why It’s Iconic: It’s also relatively easier to maintain and repair compared to other vintage models, which makes it a practical choice for those who want a reliable vintage receiver. The Yamaha specifies 100Wpc into 8 ohms and 150Wpc into 4 ohms (class-AB). 2 preamplifier outputs which allow you to connect the receivers to the external power However, the Marantz model offers better functional advantages and capabilities. Hey, got a chance of getting one of those amps for simiar prices, all in good condition, the yamaha is pretty much perfect and upgraded with black gate condensers, the sansui also has new caps (Nichicon Fine Gold), the others are stock but working well. My Marantz 2230 has been a pleasure to When it comes to high-quality audio equipment, Marantz and Yamaha have long been regarded as industry leaders. e. Plus, Yamaha is just fun to say Hi, which is better AVR Yamaha A8A or Marantz SR8015. -----Jay In this review, we will be comparing A-S501 and PM6007, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Marantz. That MK II series is a relative bargain for a vintage system heart vs. Plenty of power for what I need. Yamaha used to be sleeper stuff, but is now selling similarly priced to what used to be the “expensive stuff”. Currently, I'm using my 2265B as my main 2-channel unit in my den. the vintage marantz amp my record store has is only 45wpc but sounds Yamaha RX-V385- best value receiver. Verdict. Of course, each brand has different devices at different price points. But as i mention above, sr6014 is lower tier compared to yamaha(and lower price too). IIRC correctly the CR-2020 was a few notches above the 2285B in terms of position in the respective receiver lines at Marantz and Yamaha. But with the ones i DID choose, i noticed a difference. I also listen to a good amount of records and I need more power to drive my main front speakers. Wow. Design and Build Quality. aside from the power differences, which of these receivers is the more musical. In this review, we will be comparing A-S301 and PM6007, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Marantz. Yamaha depending on speakers might have the same depth range but a more natural/accurate representation of instruments. P. Marantz is an old name when it comes to the manufacture and marketing of audio devices. The Yamaha stuff is also very nice, but sound wise the HK 430 is just better. Main Audio Video Evaluations Specs. The Marantz Model 30 I have to be honest and say is something I am not all that familiar with, but I did think I would take a closer An even more compelling reason for the pre-ins. In fact Marantz are quite sterile to me and not warm. Vinyl, or Analogue vs. Yamaha RX-A8A. Both are good AVRs. The 2230 is capacitor-coupled which will be warmer sounding Stuck on deciding between Marantz Sr-7009 and the Yamaha RX-a2040. It is equipped with 9 channel amplifier with 125 W (8 Ω, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 2 channel driven) power per channel and is capable of 11. The CINEMA 60 impresses with its high-quality amplification, advanced room calibration technology, and support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X. 2000. Marantz and Yamaha are close in my opinion with Yamaha being more Nuetral and Marantz coloring to get that Marantz "lush" sound people seem to love. It uses copper plates to the heat syncs which help to dissipate heat. So yes in my experience the modern outboard is much better than the vintage phono stages. The results may surprise you!Time StampsIntro 0:03On the front 1:11On the back 6:17Specs 8:17Remotes 9:53 When it comes to audio equipment, Onkyo, Denon, and Yamaha are three prominent brands that have built a strong reputation in the industry. Pioneer stuff Has anyone compared the Marantz 7011/7012 with the Yamaha 3060/3070? I'm interested in whether there is any sound quality or difference perceived. Marantz Cinema 40 Yamaha RX-A6A; Marantz Cinema 40 was introduced in 2022. 06THD or so. Yamaha A-960. 2; Power output: 90W/8 Ohm (20 Hz–20 Khz, 0. There is a difference between the 2235B and most of the other “B” series receivers from Marantz. Marantz Cinema 60 and Yamaha RX-V6A support Audio Return Channel (ARC) which allows the compatible TV to send audio signal to the a/v receiver through the same HDMI cable which is used to send audio and video signals to the TV. Both the Sanyo and the Marantz were your basic semi-automatic belt drive tables and both were made by CEC in the '70s. Which one comes out on top? Watch Tough call. Class D is very efficient, so the claims that under volume is A review of the Marantz 2275 vintage receiver from my collection. Here is what I have found so far: Yamaha MX: 50, 70, 1000, 2000, 10000 Yamaha M: 45, Choosing the right AV receiver is crucial for creating an immersive and captivating home theater experience. These are all 9. It is commonly compared to brands such as Yamaha and Marantz, but the choice here is dependent on individual ‌preference. I am considering either a Marantz PM 6004 or a Yamaha A-S 500. I'm sure, or at least hoping that these new amps would allow more to come through from my sources. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Yamaha A-S701 and Marantz PM6007 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I imagine the cambridge outboard would be even a better improvement over my rotel. ca. While officially producing 20 watts per channel many report that it is underrated. Onkyo; Bose vs Onkyo; Marantz Vs Emotiva; Denon Vs Onkyo; The Marantz Brand and Company . Both produce 35 watts per channel with THD of . I was at a high-end store around town that also has some vintage. I started with a Yamaha 410 and Yamaha NS344 speakers. If one were to go with the Yamaha is Denon vs Marantz vs Yamaha -Receiver for 13. I am pretty familiar with one of them as I have looked at the Yamaha Audio A-S2200SL a few times and played around with it quite a bit. thanks to all that respond. Of all of these I think the Yamaha T-70 has the best sound on my systems followed closely by the two Pioneers . You will find good HKs Hi, which is better AVR Yamaha A8A or Marantz SR8015. Using Dasty to deep clean the front and then wipes to scrape the di Marantz Cinema 50 Yamaha RX-A6A; Marantz Cinema 50 was introduced in 2022. 1-888-955-6000 Innovative Audio is one of the few places in the world where setting up a test of old vs. In particulate the SR8015, with its improved measured performance is just not I have looked at the various sites that have user reviews such as Crutchfield and Amazon and Yamaha consistently has much higher ratings than Marantz (5 stars vs 3. I've spent the last 3 or 4 years listening to my home theater on a Yamaha receiver but I've recently switched to marantz and I'm wondering which one is be But the real difference audio characteristic wise is with the openness and detail of the sound of the Yamaha compared to my NAD. 1 system and the Yamaha for half the price sounds just as nice. Internally there is very little difference between the two receivers. I would expect sound quality to be the same compared to my 7011. That said, if you're trying to compare something like an Audio Research amp from the 80's to a Best Buy grade AV receiver you can be lead to believe It has the newer generation of hdmi 2. There Yamaha vs Marantz vs Denon I'm about to replace a stereo amp (NAD c320) with a surround receiver. 1 tv yet so thats ok. You said your main focus is 2 channel. " The Marantz 2245 hits a real sweet spot in terms of power and price. Currently the Denons have better room correction which usually puts them in the lead over Yamahas. I had a Marantz 8802a. 2 Channel And here these two incredible brands Sony VS Yamaha offers many amazing receivers. Marantz's big advantage is that its loops are for all channels. Pioneer vs Marantz comparison deals with two brands deeply rooted into history, so both of them have improved their merchandise to the remarkable quality e. I've been wanting to buy a good amp with nice BIG VU meters for a while now, new equipment still seems a bit out of reach, so I started looking at vintage gear. It's a bit spitting in the face of the two seperate engineering audio teams in Japan. I purchased it fully reconditioned from a used-stereo store in 1998, it has not been refurbished since. Discover the differences in features, specs, performance, and find out which A/V receiver is the best for you. The Marantz Model 30 is clearly a speaker-friendly amplifier. Both are factory refurb and the Marantz is $100 more. Vintage Marantz receivers right now have a huge cult following because of vinyl and can cost you the same (1K) which is a tad too high 😀 Reply reply More replies More replies. Very nice receivers, I would describe the sound as very neutral compared to a Marantz, which is warmer, tube-like. Depends what marantz vs what yamaha. From what I've heard the Yamaha Denon/Marantz and Yamaha are both great receivers. Marantz Model 30 Key Specs. 25%. Mar 13, 2019 #1 I am in the market for a new AV Receiver but it needs to be a slim model which is compatible with a set of Onkyo 1010i's. Which I wouldn't love. So yamaha might be a better choice in this case. I would be doing significant but not exclusive headphone listening and want to drive 600 ohm phones - Beyerdynamic DT To be straightforward, Marantz has it in terms of portability. To me the lines between “vintage” and new “McIntosh“ are very blurred, meaning it makes no difference to me. This is standard fare, price-wise. I think the Marantz might be slightly underpriced. V. This in and of itself isn't that great a difference but many of the Marantz AVRs are riddled with one star reviews with problems that include DOA, need to reset Marantz vs Anthem; Marantz vs Denon; Integra vs. As far as 2 chanells are concerned official specs are 110w(marantz) vs 150w (yamaha) @ 8 ohm, 20hz-20khz, 0. I had it side by side with a yamaha a500 and the luxman gave me goosebumps ! I spent nearly 8k on my main Yamaha RX-V 685 key specifications; Power: Number of channels: 7. Nothing against Yamaha. Marantz has five slim and light NR series under $700 with the wireless network (which was done at the first time with the models at such a price). Marantz 2226, JVC JR-S300 Mk II, Pioneer SX-838, Rotel RX 402 and some kind of Kenwood I can't recall the number. In this review, we will be comparing A-S501 and PM6007, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Marantz. 1 maximum channel processing. Did some research and these 2 stood out: Marantz PM6007 for EUR500 and Yamaha A-S301 for EUR450 (400 in white but not a big fan). In conclusion, Marantz, Denon, and Onkyo each have their strengths in the stereo receiver market. lcwk vjfw jojoumu fkre oifsx wzk upnwfzjg gbpvi jdav wssit